When you let go of things ultimately
you’ll have to let go of letting go. Or is it the very point of letting go? You
don’t become; you simply be. So could there be multiple stages? If you give a
f@<k about not giving a f@<k, what the f@<K are you doing? Is letting
go an action done with effort? Does it require any energy to let go? Would it
be a complete let go if you hold onto letting go? Letting go should be
something about leaving everything including all extremes and set definitions……right?
Isn't that all about transcendence?
If letting go is not an action what would cause you to let go? Shouldn't that
be the visionary understanding, deep insight or simply put: wisdom? Not giving
a f@<k is one of the most trickiest things to get hold of. How could you
define it? How could you achieve it? Well, that’s one of the impossible things
to do. Only transcendence will let you know it. To be more accurate, abandoning
the definitions itself is the transcendence.
No comments:
Post a Comment